What Creates Talent? – Part 4



Over the past week, I’ve shared some fairly counter-intuitive insight regarding talent development.  This information benefits anyone who is serious about recruiting, or wants to better coach their success-driven employees. (To catch up, read editions 1, 2, and 3)


Yesterday, I focused on what Dan Coyle has found regarding a concept that he calls ignition (momentAnna Kournikova of motivation launch).  All of us intuitively can grasp that to excel at anything, one must have the energy, passion and motivation to sustain a commitment to practice….not just any kind of practice, but deep practice.


To arrive at this level of commitment takes a moment where one experiences a spark, and says to him/herself, “I can do that, and want to do it!”  There are several ways this can happen.  A common way, is to witness achievement by someone who resembles you…someone you can relate to.


For example:

  • Since Se Ri Pak won the LPGA championship in 1998, South Korean women on tour steadily grew from one, to 33 in 2007.

  • Since Anna Kournikova reached Wimbleton finals, Russian women in the WTA top 100 has grown from three to 16.

Girls in these respective countries likely said…”She’s like me, and I can see myself doing that!”

  • As soon as Roger Banister managed to break what was considered to be an impossible barrier to the four minute mile, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz3ZLpCmKCM, other runners began to break the record.  Knowing that it was possible was all it took to trigger the motivation.

  • For me it was watching The Bob Newhart Show in 1974 and thinking to myself that Bob had the sweetest job in the world:  Getting paid to hang out with quirky people!  I know, not too deep a reason, but it did ignite the original spark. 

Whatever it is that lights the spark must happen before the commitment to practice.


Here’s a prime example of the link between ignition and commitment:  Gary McPherson set out to understand what differentiated those kids who continue to practice musical instruments and those who give up?  Predicting the continuation and talent development turns out to rest on a simple answer to a simple question:


Before children began music lessons they were asked to identify how long they believed that they’d play their instrument.  The categories were:  (1) Short-term commitment, (2) Medium-term commitment, and (3) Long-term commitment.


The results were staggering.  With the same amount of practice, the long-term commitment group out-performed the short-term group by 400%.  So what matters most, it appears, is one’s ignition level – This is what ultimately determines commitment level.


So, what does this mean for you?


How many times have you asked a new recruit about their ignition story…about what initially sparked their interest in their given field?…Or, how long they planned on continuing in their line of work?  And don’t settle for vague answers – Commit to getting solid answers.  Those answers may be the most important information you’ll ever get regarding the future your employees.


Igniting a hot bed of talent can be done.  We’ve just begun to scratch the surface regarding how it can be done.  If you’re responsible for talent development, you owe it to yourself to read Dan Coyle’s book.


Tomorrow, I’ll describe the third principle of talent growth:  Master Coaching!